Still, this opinion provides perhaps the most extensive judicial discussion of the CRFA to date.įor more on what the CRFA says and doesn’t say, see my primer. Yelp ruling, another case that tried to weaponize the CRFA against a review site (like this opinion, the court simply held that the CRFA lacks a private right of action). I believe that honor goes to the uncited Quigley v. This isn’t the first court opinion interpreting the CRFA. Burgess: “the Act ‘doesn’t interfere with the Web site operators’ ability to manage the contacts and reviews on their own Web sites’ as ‘easonable management of online reviews is necessary to ensure that they convey useful information as opposed to irrelevant or offensive content.'” The court cites the legislative history statement of Rep. Second, by its express terms (the definition of “covered communications”), the CRFA only protects reviewers, not reviewed businesses. First, the court says that only the FTC can enforce the CRFA there isn’t any private right of action. Not surprisingly, the court quickly dismisses it. This misunderstanding of the CRFA is so unexpected and preposterous, I don’t even know where to start. The plaintiff asserted the CRFA as a sword against the consumer review sites, arguing that the CRFA restricts the ability of HomeAdvisor and Angie’s List to remove consumers’ reviews about the plaintiff. The plaintiff sued them for the removal.Ĭonsumer Review Fairness Act. Soon after the AG’s action, both review sites removed the plaintiff’s profiles and associated reviews. In July 2019, the DC AG’s office sued the plaintiff for a variety of business practices. It had also advertised on HomeAdvisor, where it had many consumer reviews. It had business profiles on both review sites. The defendants are consumer review sites Angie’s List and HomeAdvisor. "We look forward to supporting HomeServe's continued growth globally as critical residential infrastructure is upgraded in the coming years to drive decarbonisation and improve energy efficiency," Brookfield Infrastructure Managing Partner Sikander Rashid said.Įarlier in May, Reuters reported that Brookfield was working with banks to sell its 45% stake in French towers firm TDF Group as it seeks to capitalise on growing demand for infrastructure assets across Europe.Ĭitigroup and Credit Suisse are working on the sale which could value TDF at more than 5 billion euros ($5.30 billion).This case is an interesting, but equally unmeritorious, variation of the many lawsuits seeking to impose “must-carry” obligations on UGC sites. HomeServe shareholders will receive 1,200 pence in cash for each share they hold, representing a roughly 71% premium to the stock price prior to its disclosure of takeover talks with Brookfield in April. News of the recommended cash deal, which adds to Brookfield's $725 billion portfolio of alternative assets, sent HomeServe's shares more than 10% higher in early trading on Thursday. FRANKFURT, May 19 (Reuters) - Canada's Brookfield Asset Management (BAMa.TO) has agreed to buy British home repair services firm HomeServe (HSV.L) for 4.08 billion pounds ($5.04 billion), as it looks to broaden its exposure to UK residential infrastructure investments.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |